The First World War Had Many Causes; The Historians Probably Have Not

The First World War had many causes; the historians probably have not yet discovered and discussed all of them so there might be more causes than what we know now. The spark of the Great War was the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand, heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, and his wife by a Serbian nationalist on the morning of June 28, 1914, while traveling in a motorcade through Sarajevo, the capital city of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Archduke was chosen as a target because Serbians feared that after his ascension to the throne, he would continue the persecution of Serbs living within the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The Serbian terrorist organization, the Black Hand, had trained a small group of teenage operatives to infiltrate Bosnia and carry out the assassination of the Archduke. It is unclear how officially active the Serbian government was in the plot. However, it was uncovered years later that the leader of the Black Hand was also the head of Serbian military intelligence. In order to understand the complexity of the causes of the war, it is very helpful to know what was the opinion of the contemporaries about the causes of the Great War. In the reprint of the article "What Started the War", from August 17, 1915 issue of The Clock magazine published on the Internet the author writes: "It is thought that this war that is been ongoing for over a year, began with the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand. However, many other reasons led to this war, some occurring as far back the late 1800's. Nationalism, militarism, imperialism, and the system of alliances were four main factors that pressed the great powers towards this explosive war." According to the article above, the author stresses that the nationalism was one of the primary causes of the war. In the ninetieth and twentieth centuries, especially after the French Revolution nationalism was becoming a powerful force in Europe so people that had the same culture, language wanted their own country. And that was the problem for the government of Austria-Hungary that did not want to lose their power and control. The Slavs in the southern part of the empire were their main concern since they wanted to join up to Serbia. Militarism is the second cause according to the article above, which comes after the nationalism. To understand what the author means by militarism one should be familiar with the situation of the world in the beginning of the century, which was the result of both industrial and democratic revolutions. Britain at that time was the largest empire in the world, and it also had the largest navy. The navy was so big and strong because the Britons needed to protect their empire and maintain the sea routes between the different colonies. The Kaiser William II of Germany hated and envied Britain for having a stronger navy than his. He increased the German navy and built many warships. Britain responded with building more ships and increasing its navy too. This started a race for building more and better warships and it created tension and competition between those two countries. Imperialism and the system of alliances are the last two major causes of the War. There was a quarrel between France and Germany about controlling the colonies, and especially Morocco, which leads to a greater conflict, the Great War. Europe at that time was divided into two rival alliance systems: Triple Entente that included Great Britain, France, and Russia and the Triple Alliance, which included the Central Powers of Austria-Hungary, Germany, and eventually the Ottoman Turkish Empire. Austria-Hungary must take a large proportion of any blame for the outbreak of war in 1914. The reason for Germany's part in the causes involves Germany's "blank Check" policy. Before sending its ultimatum to Serbia, Austria needed to be sure of the support of its ally, Germany. Such support was forthcoming in the form of a telegram to the Emperor Franz Joseph on 6 July 1914. The telegram has become known to history as the "Blank Check". In order to balance the power, France and Russia signed an alliance. Russia saw itself as the 'protector of Slavs' in the war, and immediately mobilized. When the war began, the German decision that if they were going to have to fight Russia and France, they would strike at France first according to its Schlieffen Plan, and then turn West to Russia. Germans believed that Russia at the time was unprepared for war, and that it will take a long time for Russia to mobilize its army. On July 28,

How to Conjugate Suggérer (to Suggest) in French

How to Conjugate Suggà ©rer (to Suggest) in French The French verb  suggà ©rer  looks very similar to its English meaning, to suggest. While that makes it easier to remember, youll still need to conjugate it to say things such as we suggested and I am suggesting. Dont worry, a quick lesson will help you memorize the essential forms of  suggà ©rer  you need. The Basic Conjugations of  Suggà ©rer Suggà ©rer is a stem-changing verb and that does complicate this conjugation a bit. In the indicative mood, which includes the basic present, future, and imperfect past tenses, youll notice that the accented à © changes in some forms to à ¨. Also, in the future tense, you have the option of either accent. Using the chart, you can study these conjugations by finding the subject pronoun and the corresponding tense required for your sentence. As an example,  je suggà ©re  means I am suggesting while  nous suggà ©rions  means we suggested.   Present Future Imperfect je suggre suggreraisuggrerai suggrais tu suggres suggrerassuggreras suggrais il suggre suggrerasuggrera suggrait nous suggrons suggreronssuggrerons suggrions vous suggrez suggrerezsuggrerez suggriez ils suggrent suggrerontsuggreront suggraient The Present Participle of  Suggà ©rer When you add -ant  to the radical of  suggà ©rer, you form the  present participle  suggà ©rant. This can be used as a verb, of course, though it also has the potential to become a noun or adjective in some circumstances. Suggà ©rer  in the Compound Past Tense Passà © composà ©Ã‚  is the French compound past tense. It combines the  past participle  suggà ©rà ©Ã‚  with the auxiliary verb  avoir.   Begin by conjugating  avoir  into the present tense to match the subject, then add the past participle. For example, I suggested is  jai suggà ©rà ©Ã‚  and we suggested is  nous avons suggà ©rà ©. More Simple Conjugations of  Suggà ©rer When you need to question whether the act of suggesting will happen, you can use  the subjunctive. If the action is dependent on certain conditions,  the conditional  may be used. The literary tenses of  the passà © simple  and  the imperfect subjunctive  are typically reserved for written French, though they are good to know as well. Subjunctive Conditional Pass Simple Imperfect Subjunctive je suggre suggreraissuggrerais suggrai suggrasse tu suggres suggreraissuggrerais suggras suggrasses il suggre suggreraitsuggrerait suggra suggrt nous suggrions suggrerionssuggrerions suggrmes suggrassions vous suggriez suggreriezsuggreriez suggrtes suggrassiez ils suggrent suggreraientsuggreraient suggrrent suggrassent There may also be times when youll want to use  suggà ©rer  in  the French imperative.  When you do, its acceptable to skip the subject pronoun and simply say  suggà ©rons. Imperative (tu) suggre (nous) suggrons (vous) suggrez

Ethics in Corporate America Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Ethics in Corporate America - Essay Example Moreover, the Ethics Resource Center (ERC) has detected that workforce in corporate America working in an ethical situation are keen to go beyond the limits to serve their bosses (Ethics Resource Center, 2012). Scandals within few of US’s largest corporations have produced some farsighted-overdue self-analysis among individuals in government and business. Congressional bills and Presidential speeches set forth helpful policies and ideas considering heavier sanctions for fraud and more clear-cut accounting standards for practitioners. However, it would be a misunderstanding to believe that some novel ordinances from Washington will build everything correct with the corporate world. The response to corporate trickery is not stronger or more regulation. Over 2,000 years of legislation and criminal offense have established that laws are crucial, but are not able to do the work by themselves. As the aftermath of well-publicized, recent, ethical failures, leaders concerns and public attention in government and business have centered on the ethical atmosphere of corporate America. This concern and awareness is eliciting anticipations for ethical conduct, admitting those statute into law (for instance, Sarbanes Oxley legislation), and producing social pressures for regenerate. Business leaders must realize the scope and nature of the issue. The focus of media on corporate ethics has connected chiefly to publicly-traded large corporations. Nevertheless, the matter of ethical indiscretion and behavior is a worry for all organizations, irrespective of size. Indeed, the developing significance of enterprising firms to economic process and development all over the world has motivated some to condemn the restrained notice small business experiences in the ethics related literature. Research Objectives The mention of â€Å"Enron†,â€Å"WorldCom†and â€Å"Arthur Andersen†, titles that at one time directed to conversations about global business under standing and success, now brings up images of unethical behavior and greed. The humiliations surrounding these companies, accompanied with an interpenetrating perception of a deficiency of ethics demonstrated by the acts of business leaders, have caused a direct impression on businesses’ ability to contend, create jobs, and assist in pulling the American economy out of its economical down turn. In spite of the current attention channelized toward the unethical behavior of the leadership of these companies, the matter of business ethics violation, a phrase referred usually as an oxymoron by a few, is not novel. The basic consideration of this research is to draw the sources of rising ethical concerns in the Corporate America and their aftermath. Business Ethics and the Corporate America The terminology of ‘business ethics’, as employed in and mentioned to, in the place of work, was for the first time coined approximately in the 1970s. Its beginning was first emplo yed in academician writings, education, and then in society conferences and meetings originated to tap the field as a novel wave of education took hold. As the terminology inserted in the workplace during the period of late 1980s and early 1990s, there was an effort to construct ethics into the groundwork of organizations in the form of ethics officers, ethics codes, ethics training and ethics committee. This ethics acceptance evidently collapsed in the early twenty first century. Corporate executives were evaluated on either meeting or outperforming their goals, and were provided handsome rewards with huge remunerations, immense stock